Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
OosKaapJagter wrote:In plaas daarvan om te kyk wat die minste is waarmee jy kan wegkom, sou ek sê gee 'n ordentlike motivering EN 'n afskrif van die hofbevel.
Dit is beter om jou lisensie te kry as om te sit en wonder of die volgende KFC eter jou standpunt gaan insien.
Onthou dat as jou aansoek afgekeur word, moet jy dit opnuut indien, 'n appèl aanteken of hof toe gaan. Die regter wat jou saak in 'n ander provinsie aanhoor is dalk net 'n anti-vuurwapen GFSA lid.
So you're saying continue giving in to CFR's made up rules and ignore the FCA?
I'm seriously thinking about trying an application with only what the Act requires and a copy of this order.
Naandsê
Ek moet binnekort semi haelgeweer se lisensie inhandig.
Waar trek ons nou met die motiverings debakel tov sport status ens?
Ek luister
Cheers
Cobus
Johannesburg
Christus
BRNO 308, BRNO 22, Howa 243AI, MAB 7.65
12Ga Semi, Fabarm 12G O/U, AYA 12G S/S
Barnett Z 350CRT
Stormers/WP(kyk darm nie meer SA rugby nie)
In response to Ranger I may indicate that I submitted two applications since this court order was brought to my attention. In both instances I however did submit motivations, albeit cryptic ones. These were single page efforts that I wrote myself. One was for an additional handgun (9mm pistol) and the other for a second .22 rifle. I attached a printed copy of the court order and highlighted the area stating that no motivation was in fact required.
Both applications were successful, although I am still waiting for the 9mm's licence card.
Thus I wasn't brave enough to fully rely on that court order alone, but it does say to them that we know what they are doing and they may face legal ramifications if they should refuse the applications on flimsy grounds.
OosKaapJagter wrote: Thu May 21, 2020 8:40 am
In response to Ranger I may indicate that I submitted two applications since this court order was brought to my attention. In both instances I however did submit motivations, albeit cryptic ones. These were single page efforts that I wrote myself. One was for an additional handgun (9mm pistol) and the other for a second .22 rifle. I attached a printed copy of the court order and highlighted the area stating that no motivation was in fact required.
Both applications were successful, although I am still waiting for the 9mm's licence card.
Thus I wasn't brave enough to fully rely on that court order alone, but it does say to them that we know what they are doing and they may face legal ramifications if they should refuse the applications on flimsy grounds.
Ek raai geen lede van on SAJ tak aan om net op daai 'court order' staat te maak nie. Ek is net bang dat hulle dit as arogansie kan sien as jy hulle met hulle eie pap in hulle gesig gooi. Ek weet wel van n van iemand wat die 2 keer reggekry het, hy het dit toe met 3 lisensies gelyktydig probeer en die uiteinde was 3 afkeurings - You failed to convince the registrar........julle ken die storie. Sit maar daai paar uur se werk in / laat JRM die joppie namens jou doen anders sit n man dalk met n 2de stel 90 dae wag...
"Mag ek nooit onthou word vir dit wat ek gejag het nie, maar eerder vir hoe ek gejag het."